Farewell to the 1994 Regulation. Mexico Launches New Industrial Property Rules for the Digital Age

May 14, 2026
4 min read

Dear clients and friends,

With the objective of keeping you informed about the most relevant regulatory changes in industrial property matters in Mexico, we present our analysis of the Decree published on April 28, 2026, in the Diario Oficial de la Federación (Official Gazette), through which President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo issued the new Regulation of the Federal Law on Protection of Industrial Property (LFPPI), revoking the Regulation that had been in force since 1994. This new regulation modernizes administrative procedures before the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI), incorporates digital tools, regulates technology transfer, and establishes alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.

Below, we present the most relevant aspects:

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Why is this new Regulation relevant?

The previous Regulation dates back to 1994 and did not contemplate the digital environment nor the legislative advances derived from the LFPPI in force since 2020 and its 2026 amendment. The new regulation updates procedures, incorporates online filing, the use of electronic signatures, electronic notifications, and digital file management, providing greater legal certainty to rights holders and applicants.

  1. When does the new Regulation come into force?

The Decree came into force sixty business days after its publication, which is approximately August 2026.

The online administrative infringement declaration procedure will come into force when IMPI publishes the corresponding technical agreement, which must be issued within a period of no more than eighteen months.

  1. What is the Technology Transfer Registry and why does it matter?

A Technology Transfer Registry administered by IMPI is created, in which license agreements, intellectual property rights assignments, confidentiality agreements, research collaboration agreements, consulting agreements, and other legal instruments will be registered. Registration is not a requirement for validity between the parties, but it is a condition for enforceability against third parties. This registry is essential to protect the interests of companies and research centers that transfer or receive technology.

  1. What are the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms provided in the Regulation?

The Regulation regulates, for the first time at the regulatory level, ADR mechanisms before IMPI. Parties in an administrative infringement procedure may resort to conciliation at any stage, before a final resolution is issued. Meetings may be held in person or by videoconference. Conciliation agreements will have the force of res judicata once ratified by the competent authority, and when they involve the modification or extinction of intellectual property rights, they must be registered in the corresponding registries.

  1. What changes in trademark and patent proceedings?

Regarding trademarks, the Regulation clarifies representation rules for non-traditional marks (sounds, smells, motion, multimedia, position), conditions for express consent between co owners of similar signs, and requirements to prove acquired distinctiveness. Regarding patents, clear rules are incorporated for provisional applications, disclosure criteria, genetic resources, and traditional knowledge. Additionally, a specific mandatory resolution issuance procedure is established to ensure compliance with maximum resolution deadlines.

  1. What does the online administrative infringement declaration procedure entail?

The Regulation provides for the online processing of administrative infringement declaration procedures before IMPI. The file will be electronic, documents may be submitted with advanced electronic signatures, notifications will be made digitally, and the system will be available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. This advancement is significant for expediting the protection of industrial property rights and reducing the time and costs of proceedings.

Conclusion

The new LFPPI Regulation represents a significant step forward in the modernization of Mexico's industrial property system.

The digitization of proceedings, the creation of the Technology Transfer Registry, the incorporation of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and the new rules on trademarks and patents generate new opportunities, but also new obligations and strategies that companies, entrepreneurs, inventors, and rights holders must consider. It is essential to review existing contracts and agreements involving industrial property rights to determine whether it is advisable to register them in the new Technology Transfer Registry and to take advantage of ADR opportunities for more agile and cost-effective dispute resolution.


At Ramos, Ripoll & Schuster®, we have the experience needed to advise you on matters of intellectual property, industrial property, licensing, technology, and artificial intelligence. For any inquiries related to these topics, we remain at your disposal.


Our specialist lawyers

Our team of lawyers is ready to help you understand how to apply these new rules to your company or investment project.

Elías-Fernández, Edmundo

Senior Partner

Ripoll-González, Alejandro

Senior Partner

Amador Espinosa, Juan Rafael

Senior Associate

Márquez Ledezma, Daniela

Associate

Castañeda García, Sofía

Junior Associate

Ramos Macías, Andrea

Staff

You may also be interested
in the following articles

January 12, 2026

Elimination of Fees for the Conciliation Procedure before INDAUTOR as of 2026

March 18, 2026

Proposed Amendment to the Federal Law for the Protection of Industrial Property: Key Changes

March 12, 2026

IMPI Picks Up the Speed: Limits on Office Actions and Direct Dialogue in Patent Prosecution

May 14, 2026

Decree for the Immediate Authorization of Investments

January 12, 2026

First Communication from the Data Protection Authority: Risks Associated with the Use of Open Source CMS

March 04, 2026

Publication of constitutional reform to reduce working hours